Posted on

Master Class: Cloddiau

The content below was copied with the generous permission of the author,

Sean Adcock.

This Master Class article originally appeared in the Summer 1996 issue of Stonechat, produced by the North Wales Branch of the Dry Stone Walling Association of Great BritainThis entire issue of Stonechat, and many more, are available at http://www.dswales.org.uk/Stonechat.html

Thank you to Sean for allowing us to provide this content.

Please donate to The North Wales Branch.

Cloddiau (Preface)

Last year [1995] saw the addition of “Manylebion ar gyfer cloddiau: Specifications for Welsh clawdd walIs” to the DSWA’s list of free leaflets. This was the first bi-lingual leaflet to be produced by the National Association and received grant-aiding from the Countryside Council for Wales.

The Branch is gradually increasing its activities in attempting to help preserve these walls which in some forms are almost uniquely Welsh and in many respects more neglected and their construction more of a lost art, than dry stone walls.

Literally translated the Welsh “clawdd” (plural “cloddiau”) means hedge, dyke or embankment. Sometimes it is mistakenly used to describe all walls, although almost without exception older wallers etc., use the term specifically refer to stone faced earth banks.

Cloddiau are akin to Cornish Hedges, that is a dry stone outer with a compacted earth (or earth/rubble core). The pattern of the stonework varies considerably from area to area largely dependant on the stone type used and to a lesser extent local traditions. This type of structure can be found in most walling areas, but most notably Devon and Cornwall and Welsh Coastal districts, and to a lesser extent in the North West of England. Generally they are found in lower lying areas where stone is scarcer than the uplands. Examples can be found throughout North Wales but they are generally the exception rather than the rule except for Anglesey, the Bangor/Caernarfon coastal strip, and the Lleyn.

Very often they have (or have had) a hedge on top of them, occasionally a ditch is present to one side (probably where the earth core was originally dug, and serving to gain height on one side). However they are often bare on top and can be surprisingly low (frequently less than a metre high). Most of the areas where they are most common were cattle areas and hence there was less need for height in terms of stock proofing. If additional stock proofing was required dead wood or gorse would have been piled on top of their (normally) wide top.

They tend to have greater sloping sides compared to dry stone work, primarily to aid stability, particularly important with taller cloddiau where the weight of soil contained can be quite considerable. In some cases (the norm with Cornish Hedges, but rare in North Wales) taller cloddiau would have a concave face. This would aid stability at the base, whilst the relatively vertical slope higher up would add to stock-proofing.

The most common Welsh form (and extremely rare outside of Wales) is built with the stone set vertically (placed on edge with the longest axis of the stone set running into the clawdd) in more or less even courses, with course height gradually diminishing with each additional course. Stone size itself is more or less unimportant with many examples where there are several courses of 5-8cm. This method of construction can be particularly strong as the stones can be firmly wedged together as with coping on a dry stone wall.

Random built cloddiau are not uncommon. These are essentially dry stone walls with earth centres, and are particularly unstable if the stones are not laid with their longest axis into the wall. They are particularly common in areas where shale or similar rock, especially slabs are common. Something of a rarity are random cloddiau with vertically set stone, but they do exist.

In areas where large boulders are present the clawdd is often built random between the boulders until a relatively even height is achieved, and then finished off with courses of smaller vertical stone. A similar method is employed in areas where larger ‘river stone’ is utilised.

Another pattern, common elsewhere, but a rarity in North Wales is “herring bone”. Here the stones are set in courses but are sloped rather than vertical. In any one course the stones slope the same way, but the slope is reversed on each subsequent course. Occasionally between each pair of alternating courses a course of stones is set flat (i.e. as in dry stone walling). Every now and then you might come across a wall where all the courses slope the same way.

Some very low cloddiau are built in panels. At regular intervals along the wall a single stone is set which runs from base to top of the wall, the clawdd is then built as normal for the area between these. The size of panel varies depending presumably on the availability of the dividing stones when it was originally constructed.

It is a common misconception that Cloddiau are built with turves in their face. This misconception is probably brought about by the proliferation of growth on roadside cloddiau, and the occasional field-wall. This growth is almost inevitably the consequence of colonisation and low grazing pressure over a long period of years (hence the growth on roadside walls, just pop into the grazed field to see the difference on the other side). When reconstructed with a proliferation of turves in the face there is a serious risk of collapse as the turves almost inevitably dry out and shrink.

One of the important aspects of cloddiau which is often forgotten, is their wildlife role. The earth core can be a haven for small mammals – more so than a dry stone wall – and in fact I came across a clawdd once where there was a slight difference in field level either side of the wall and it was absolutely riddled with badger holes. Insects can abound between the stones, and then there is the flora. Cloddiau are a far more suitable habitat for a wide range of plants because of the soil. Where there is a hedge it gets even better (everyone seems to know how important hedges are, a clawdd can just be a raised hedge minus the larger trees), and add a ditch with water and you have a mini nature reserve. Something in excess of 80% of all the recorded flowering plant species in Wales have actually been found on cloddiau, which given that the montane species haven’t been recorded as there are few if any cloddiau above 1000’, this is a truly remarkable figure.

Master Class: Cloddiau

Clawdd rebuilt by the author near Brynsiencyn

As part of the Branch’s activities to help preserve Cloddiau earlier in the summer we ran our first Clawdd Construction Training Course. Hopefully it will be the first of many and to provide a taster of what can be a unique way of using stone this masterclass deals with one aspect of the work, that is the placement and coursing of the vertical stones.

One of the major misconceptions people hold about clawdd construction is that it is particularly difficult to course the stone. Compared to coursing a dry stone wall it is really easy.

During the stripping out process the stone is set out either in lines or piles of similarly sized stone. Note the use of similarly. The key to coursing a clawdd is not to worry about being too precise, look at an old clawdd and you will see that there is often a difference of 2cm or more between adjacent stones yet the overall effect is of a coursed wall. My experience in teaching people this method of construction is that they tend to try and be too precise, and of course when they are not being precise the differences end up being too great! At some point it all clicks and suddenly you realise that compared to dry stone walling it is very easy indeed.

Trainee on national trust/ATB Landbase course, Cemlyn, Anglesey

The use of lines is crucial to coursing. They should be set to a height that accommodates the average size of the largest stones you have left, always set the line to fit the stone you have left, do not arbitarily raise it to a height and then try to find stones that fit. The only thing as far as size is concerned is to ensure that the line is set so that the height of each course diminishes as the wall gets higher. just as in a dry stone wall your smallest stone should be used nearest the top of the wall.

Once in place the line is used as a guide to help you keep the line and batter, and as an aid to the height of stone required. It is only an aid and a guide, it is not supposed to determine exactly what size stone you want. With experience stone selection becomes increasingly accurate and the courses become more and more even.

(In order to determine how) high the course is going to be you need to select a stone and place it. In this article I’m going to explain this on the basis that one course has already been completed. If the Clawdd is vertically coursed from ground up then the only difference between the first and second course (beyond a few foundation considerations I am not dealing with here) is that you can dig the stones into the ground to give a very level course. Other Cloddiau have either a dry stone wall component at their base or a number of larger boulders or flat stones in the foundation. Here you usually have a relatively even base with just a few minor variations in height, and your first course will consequently have to be built out of more stones of an even height. If you want to know more about these aspects you’ll have to come on a course or buy the booklet coming out sometime next year!

The first thing to do is to make a small ramp of soil inside the wall just beyond the point the building stones will reach to (see diagram below).

When placing a building stone it is very similar to coping a dry stone wall. Once the height of the stone has been decided on there are two major considerations:
– Placed length into wall (making sure longer than high). This rule is NEVER broken.
– Tightly fitting with neighbours, alongside and below, with no voids

This is of course the ideal, small gaps are inevitable, but the fewer there are the stronger the wall.

The stone is set on the wall, because it is set vertically it may be necessary to use a small amount of soil from your ramp, alongside stones with rounder bases to ensure that they do not fall over. Care has to be taken to ensure that you do not get too much soil on the previous course as one of the keys to a strong clawdd is to ensure stone to stone contact at all times. On occasion a small amount of stone from the ramp used around the ‘tail’ of your building stone can also help.

When you build your first clawdd it is best to work sequentially, i.e. you place your first stone, then the one immediately next to it, then the one next to that, ad infinitum. Care needs to be taken to ensure a good fit, and that you set each stone vertically. It is all too easy to slightly slope a stone so that it is the right height, and whilst the odd one will probably not show in the end result a number of them can turn the end result into quite a mish-mash.

There is a knack to making sure the stone is sitting tightly against its neighbour and care must be taken that the stones remain tight throughout the sequence. To ensure a tight end result every couple of feet key stones are used.

These are stones which are slightly narrower at their base than their top and when forced down into the course the stones either side are squeezed together.

The distance between these stones varies with stone size and type and there is no specific distance. The important thing is that all the stones between them get squeezed just enough. For example if you find that in general a key stone squeezes the next 12” of stones then you need them about every 24” (they squeeze in both directions).

So how does this fit into the sequential method for learners? Experimentation is the only way to get the distances, normally you try for gaps of around 18” and take it from there through observation of the end result. As to the actual process….

Having selected a key stone you place it on the wall next in your sequence, then you select the next stone and place it. Next remove the key stone and move the single stone slightly into the gap left by the key stone, then continue your sequence to the next key stone. Once these stones are in place the first keystone can be forced down into the gap left for it and hey presto it squeezes the building stones, you hope!

Once again the effectiveness of this is very much trial and error when you start learning. If the gap left for the keystone is too small you either cannot jam it in, or when you do it forces the adjacent stones out of line rather than tightening them. If the gap for the keystone is wider than it need be then it doesn’t tighten the course sufficiently. Another of the keys to success is to ensure that the stones either side of the keystone have good flat sides so that the keystone has something to key against!

Either sometime during this process, or at the end of each course you need to firmly wedge the ‘tails’ of the stones, below and between. Assuming you have wedges that is, if not soil needs to be firmly compacted into all nooks and crannies (and any that are left after wedging anyway). When hammering in wedges or compacting soil between stones (usually with end of a hammer handle) care has to be taken not to loosen or dislodge the building stones.

A course is completed the middle is filled (come on a course if you want to know more about that aspect!) and so onto the next course.

Repeat the process, simple?
Now the problems start! Having used your line as a guide you will hopefully have a nice even course, the problems arise where you have taken the art of being inexact to the extreme and left a step between stones. This step inevitably makes placing the next building stone somewhat difficult.

With a lot of effort you can probably compensate for the step so that the next course will be easier. However if you are not very precise the step will continue on up through the courses and you will have a nasty running joint.

A well constructed clawdd should not have many two stone joints, just as with a dry stone wall it should be ‘1 on 2 and 2 on 1’. As the stones are set vertically some joints are almost inevitable, especially for beginners, but these should never be grouped together or allowed to develop into three stone joints. It can take a lot of care and effort as you are not only now worrying about the height of the stone and the internal fit of stones, you also have to contemplate its width.

The easiest way of avoiding joints is to utilise the little dips that form between each of the stones. Slightly taller building stones can be used in these and hence two birds are killed with one stone (so to speak!). It is here the inexact nature of the coursing and the opportunity to use a variety of sizes within anyone course comes to the fore. As long as you leave a relatively even surface between adjacent stones you can get away with murder, as long as you don’t take it to extremes and end up with a course that is vastly undulating.

Clawdd built by trainees at Cemlyn, Anglesey, showing an amount of variation in the coursing

There is another method of construction which with experience can enable you to ensure better coursing and crossing of joints, and that is to work in a far less sequential method. You use the line as a far more accurate indication of height and place stones in the dips left in the previous course, sometimes sequentially and sometimes completely at random.

Eventually you have a number of clusters of stones and you just jam a keystone into each gap and proceed as before. It can be a far faster and more accurate method of coursing, but I do not recommend it for beginners. Until you are familiar with the basic process it can prove more problematic. With this method you have to find keystones to fit gaps, rather than create gaps for preselected keystones. If you are not very careful you will also end up with sections that are too large for keystones to squeeze sufficiently. However once you have a day or two’s experience under your belt its worth giving it a go to see how you progress.

Want to know more? How to avoid the steps that develop in a coursed face, how to finish off the wall, what to do with all the stupid lumps, why you need a length of three by two wood or similar, exactly how do you determine what height to set the lines to, what should the batter be, what on earth is a concave batter let alone how to do it, why a stone has slipped out of the face despite having done everything outlined above? Then contact a committee member and I’ll run some more courses!

Sean Adcock